Epstein Secrets

ave re- fused to recognize breach of fiduciary duty claims brought against priests or dioceses because such claims offend the First Amendment- See Gaines, 354 F.Supp2d at 583 (citing Dausch v. Rykse, 52 F.3d 1426, 1438 (7th Cir.1994)); Teadt v. St. John's Evangelical Church. of Burr Oak Mick, 237 M

ligion- neutral as they "involve) I purely secular conduct that is analogous to an intentional tort and does not hinge on ecclesiastical matters." Gaines, 354 F.Supp2d at 583. A court also need not define a reasonable standard of care or inquire as to whether EFTA00226241 DOE v. 1,1DERATORE cue a

affirm the judgment of the District Court. John DOE # 1; Kelly Doe # 1, Parents of Jane Doe # 1, Individually and as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; Kelly Doe # 2, Parents of Jane Doe # 2, as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 2 I William Lawson CHAMBERLIN, Jr.; Kathr

ll get back with you. Thanks again. From: Sloane, Carmen [mailto Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:19 PM To: Barbara Bums Cc: Baker, Rosalyn; Gaines, Willie Subject: Jeffrey Epstein «P154Scanner20090923170423.pdf>> Mrs. Bums, FYI - This is Mr. Epstein response to Attorney Horowitz declaration.

6, 09-80802, 09-81092, DECLARATION OF ADAM D. HOROWITZ 1. My name is Adam D. Horowitz. I am an attorney for Jane Doe No. 4. 2. The deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 was scheduled for September 16, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. at 350 Australian Ave. South, Suite 115, West Palm Beach, Florida. On the day before the de

offer any more assistance. From: Sloane, Carmen [mailtplIMIIIMIMIal Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:45 AM To: Barbara Burns Cc: Baker, Rosalyn; Gaines, Willie Subject: Jeffrey Esptein <<P154Scanner20091009075059.pdf>> Mrs. Bums, I sent an email on September 23 regarding "No contact with the vict

oane, Carmen Subject: RE: Jeffrey Esptein Sorry, I have been in non-stop trials until today! How nice of him to use her name instead of initials or Jane Doe! Unfortunately she is not the designated victim of our State case. If there is a no contact order then it is by way of a Protective Order or possib

t and will get back with you. Thanks again. From: Sloane, Carmen Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:19 PM To: Barbara Bums Cc: Baker, Rosalyn; Gaines, Willie Subject: Jeffrey Epstein «P154Scanner20090923170423.pdf>> Mrs. Bums, FYI - This is Mr. Epstein response to Attorney Horowitz declaration.

6, 09-80802, 09-81092, DECLARATION OF ADAM D. HOROWITZ 1. My name is Adam D. Horowitz. I am an attorney for Jane Doe No. 4. 2. The deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 was scheduled for September 16, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. at 350 Australian Ave. South, Suite 115, West Palm Beach, Florida. On the day before the de

on't have more Info or can't offer any more assistance. From: Sloane, Carmen Sent: Friday, October 011 AM To: Barbara Burns Cc: Baker, Rosalyn; Gaines, Willie Subject: Jeffrey Espteln <<P154Scanner20091009075059.pdf>> Mrs. Bums, I sent an email on September 23 regarding "No contact with the vict

loane, Carmen Subject: RE: Jeffrey Esptein Sony, I have been in non-stop trials until today! How nice of him to use her name instead of initials or Jane Doe! Unfortunately she is not the designated victim of our State case. If there is a no contact order then it is by way of a Protective Order or possib