Epstein Secrets

sealed. the settlement might not have been reached. Appellant Decker is the plaintiff in the case of Decker v. American Motors Corp., No. 474278, Superior Court of San Diego County, State of California (hereinafter the "California suit"). The California suit is also a wrongful death claim, involving a 1977

2, the court held that 'The Constitution grants neither press nor public the right to physical access to courtroom exhibits." (emphasis added). In Newman v. Graddick 696 F.2d 796 (11th Cir. 1983), ow court discussed at some length various aspects of these rights pertaining to the openness of civil t

have very strong incentives 257 See Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470, 475-76 (1973); United States v. Bahamonde, 445 F.3d 1225, 1229 (9th Cir. 2006); Newman v. Hopkins, 192 F.3d 1132, 1135 (8th Cir. 1999), vacated 529 U.S. 1084 (2000); United States ex rel. Veal v. DeRobertis, 693 F.2d 642, 646- 47 (7th C

government has no obligation to obtain for a defendant records that it does not already have in its possession or control"); State ex rel. Romley v. Superior Court, 836 P.2d 445, 452 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992) ("Brady emphasizes suppression of evidence by the prosecution, but does not require the victim to cooperate

access is an affirmative, enforceable public right, and the standing of the press to enforce it is well settled. See, e.g., Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 609 n.25 (1982); Hanford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, 380 F.3d 83, 91 (2d Cir. 2004). EFTA00017095 --- PAGE BREAK --- filing, on Au

ed to conditions of confinement, and openness of those proceedings and records would undoubtedly enhance the functioning of the process. Cf., e.g., Newman v. Graddiek, 696 F.2d 796, 801 (11th Cir. 1983) (right of access to civil trials pertaining to confinement conditions); Graham, 257 F.3d at 154 ("T