Epstein Secrets

rio that the defendant had been permitted "to plead to a crime less serious than the one that could be proven." People v. Johnson, 77 A.D.3d at 550 (McGuire, J. concurring). Finally, it is clear that the ordinary rules of preservation apply to an appeal from a SORA. determination. agg People v. Windham

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH'. MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00602404 -

- First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dc.fendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 (212) 335-9000 [email protected]

rio that the defendant had been permitted "to plead to a crime less serious than the one that could be proven." People v. Johnson, 77 A.D.3d at 550 (McGuire, J. concurring). Finally, it is clear that the ordinary rules of preservation apply to an appeal from a SORA. determination. agg People v. Windham

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH L. MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00792566

- First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dcfendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 (212) 335-9000 [email protected]

rio that the defendant had been permitted "to plead to a crime less serious than the one that could be proven." People v. Johnson, 77 A.D.3d at 550 (McGuire, J. concurring). Finally, it is clear that the ordinary rules of preservation apply to an appeal from a SORA determination. Sce People v. NEShani,

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH L MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00181213 -

n - First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant-Appellant BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 danyappea s any.nyc.gov GINA MIGNOLA