4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
has been used in sex trafficking cases involving the exploitation of the poor and disadvantaged from foreign countries. See, e.g., United States v. Julian, 427 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005) (sex tourism operator in Mexico facilitating travel of poor Mexican boy for sexual relationship in the United States
stretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modem day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting the internet trolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young
e has been used in sex trafficking cases involving the exploitation of the poor and disadvantaged from foreign countries. See, e.g., United States' Julian, 427 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005) (sex tourism operator in Mexico facilitating travel of poor Mexican boy for sexual relationship in the United States
tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting thentemebrolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peop
has been used in sex trafficking cases involving the exploitation of the poor and disadvantaged from foreign countries. See, e.g., United States v. Julian, 427 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005) (sex tourism operator in Mexico facilitating travel of poor Mexican boy for sexual relationship in the United States
tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting th(internerolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peo
has been used in sex trafficking cases involving the exploitation of the poor and disadvantaged from foreign countries. See, e.g., United States v. Julian, 427 F.3d 471 (7i6 Cir. 2005) (sex tourism operator in Mexico facilitating travel of poor Mexican boy for sexual relationship in the United States
tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting th(mtemebrolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peop
Entities connected to both Julian and the Ambit of the Statute

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Joe Biden
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONLeon Black
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Columbia University
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Las Vegas
LOCATION
Hunter Biden
PERSON
New York State
LOCATIONEvans
PERSON
Alberto Gonzales
PERSONRoy Black
PERSONStrevell
ORGANIZATIONGerald Lefcourt
PERSON