Epstein Secrets

in which the crime occurred," the CVRA clearly provid for "rights ... that apply before any prosecution is underway." (United States . BP Products North America, Inc., Criminal No. 11-07-434, 2008 WL 501321 at *11 (S.D.Tex. Feb.21, 2008) (emphasis in original), mandamus denied in part, In re Dean, No. 08-20

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00177302 Case 9:08-cv-; i-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/. )8 Page 4 of 21 had been tried federally and

y Edwards' other client, T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

y on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 377I(dX3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant i

the VNS Internet site, you will be prompted to enter your last name (or business name) as currently contained in VNS. The nerne you should enter is Eisenberg. EFTA00229990 %029 Paw 3 of 3 r, /tar 07/09/2006 15:15 FAX 8618059846 UMW WPB COEWIRII case 9;08-cy: 80736-KAM ailment 48-7 Entered on FLSD

4Ag.j1 Ppapgpf 3 • U.S. Department of Justice Federal, &Urea of Investigation FBI - West Palm Beach • January10.200B James Bsonberg RIES Dear James Eisenberg. You have requested to fateNe nottfiCetione for Tahe This case is currenify under Investigation. This can be a lengthy process and we request your

ely on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States" BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 3771(dX3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant i

FBI - West Palm Beach State 500 505 South Flintier Drive West Par Beach. FL. 33901 Phone' (501) 833-7517 Fax: (581) 833•7970 .lanualy 10, 2008 James Eisenberg Ons Cieaaake Carter Ste 7C4 Australian South West Pam Beach FL 32901 Re aleallillr Dear James Eisenberg. You have requested to MONS notification

ss the VNS Internet sate, you war be prompted to enter your last name (or business name) as currently contained in VNS. The name you should enter is Eisenberg 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000744 EFTA00230568 07/09/2006 15:15 FAX 8618059846 LIMO IFB COMM %029 case 9;08-cy: 80736-KAM _Moment 48-7 Entered on FLSD

gest reasons that one model prevailed over others. A. Victim Rights and Private Versus Public Interests In the wake of victims’ rights movements in North America and Europe, crime victims now have an array of legal nights once criminal charges are filed. Victims in the U.S. and European jurisdictions now commo

lack Jacket): A Critique on the Lack of Prosecution of Hunting "Accidents," 56.S.C. L. Rev. 135, 166-73 (2004). © See id.; Duane, supra note 48. 5! Eisenberg, supra note 45, at 893-96 (discussing data from prosecutor interviews). In the contexts Eisenberg describes, prosecutors typically forgo hate-crime o

ight to approve or disapprove a proposed plea in advance or to participate in plea negotiations." In re Dean on remand as United States tBP Products North America, Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009). Instead, "[t]he purpose of the reasonable right to confer is for victims to provide information t

the investigation if the facts arc known or might attempt to escape if they have reason to believe certain indictments will issue. United States v. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983) (citing United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681 n.6 (1958)). Several of the "facts" contained