Epstein Secrets

EMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DEPOSITIONS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF RULE 45 Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON. MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 EFTA00605112 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 228 Filed 06/20/

LATION OF RULE 45 Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON. MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. East 10th Ave

) 19 Grochowski v. Phoenix Const., 318 F.3d 80, 86 (2d Cir.2003). 5 lantosca v. Benistar Admin. Svcs., Inc., 765 F.Supp.2d 79 (D. Mass. 2011) 6 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 1997) 16 Murphy v. Board of Educ., 196 F.R.D. 220, 222 (W.D.N.Y.2000) 19 Perfect Pearl Co., Inc. v

served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: Fax: Email: 21 /s/ Sigrid S. McCawley Sigrid S. McCawl

ted by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 1

Deposit Co. of Maryland, 45 F.3d 969 (5th Cir. 1995) 6 In re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation, 2005 WL 375315 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2005) 17 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997) passim Rules Fed. R. Evid. 611(c) 16 ii EFTA00622177 Plaintiff respectfully submits her repl

ER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY PAGLIUCA LAURA A. MENNINGER DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Attorneys for Respondent Sharon Churcher BY: ERIC J. FEDER LAW OFFICES OF Attorneys BY: GREGORY L.

REMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY PAGLIUCA LAURA A. MENNINGER DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP A

t would not justify a deposition, which leaves really the Fifth Amendment implications that have been represented will be made, and that raises the LiButti issue. And under LiButti, your Honor, really the permeating factor is control. And the typical case -- really, most of the cases, to the extent co

ly, your Honor, I think you can 10 just see from the upset there what's going to be happening at 11 this trial. This is the direct quote from Mr. Pagliuca. 12 "Fantastical conspiracy". That's going to be the argument from 13 the other side. They're obviously entitled to advance that 14 argument. B

ing to conceal that from the jury or are we going to present 7 it to them? Well, the Second Circuit case that your Honor is 8 well familiar with, LiButti, sets out the factors that have 9 determined that issue, and one of the things we hear from the 10 defendant is, oh, it's never been applied in a

ly, your Honor, I think you can 10 just see from the upset there what's going to be happening at 11 this trial. This is the direct quote from Mr. Pagliuca. 12 "Fantastical conspiracy". That's going to be the argument from 13 the other side. They're obviously entitled to advance that 14 argument. B

we going to conceal that from the jury or are we going to present it to them? Well, the Second Circuit case that your Honor is well familiar with, LiButti, sets out the factors that have determined that issue, and one of the things we hear from the defendant is, oh, it's never been applied in a case l

: In reply, your Honor, I think you can just see from the upset there what's going to be happening at this trial. This is the direct quote from Mr. Pagliuca. "Fantastical conspiracy". That's going to be the argument from the other side. They're obviously entitled to advance that argument. But that's wh

we going to conceal that from the jury or are we going to present it to them? Well, the Second Circuit case that your Honor is well familiar with, LiButti, sets out the factors that have determined that issue, and one of the things we hear from the defendant is, oh, it's never been applied in a case l