Epstein Secrets

RETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO THE S2 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C.

rd Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

ame conduct. Counts Five and Six of the S2 Indictment are therefore barred by the NPA. The Court must dismiss these counts, as well as the expanded Mann Act conspiracies charged in Counts One and Three, which incorporate the same conduct charged in Counts Five and Six for which Ms. Maxwell has immunity.

PORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA0006598

tian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

greement that its own agents negotiated and agreed to with the approval of senior levels of Main Justice. • The government has concocted a federal Mann Act case against Ms. Maxwell by alleging that, on some unspecified occasion during a four-year period between 1994 and 1997, and in an unspecified mann

MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE RELATED TO ACCUSER-3 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemhei

rd Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR-213 (MKB), 2014 WL 3734522 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2014) 12 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) 7 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 7 Mann Act passim Other Authorities Fed. R. Evid. 401 12 Fed. R. Evid. 402 11, 12 Fed. R. Evid. 403 passim Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) passim Fed. R. Evid

E FROM SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bo

York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

with Jeffrey Epstein that would violate N.Y. Penal Law § 130.55. Indictment¶¶ 13, 19. The indictment does not charge Ms. Maxwell with a substantive Mann Act violation as to any individual other than Accuser-1, nor does it allege that Ms. Maxwell personally enticed or caused any person other than Accuser-

x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE RELATED TO ACCUSER-3 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA0008777

tian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR-213 (MKB), 2014 WL 3734522 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2014) 12 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) 7 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 7 Mann Act passim Other Authorities Fed. R. Evid. 401 12 Fed. R. Evid. 402 11, 12 Fed. R. Evid. 403 passim Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) passim Fed. R. Evid

NITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTIONS IN LIMINE Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver Phone: Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York NY Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim

IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTIONS IN LIMINE Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.

ein intended to engage in sexual contact with her. See id. It is the government. not the defense, that apparently does not understand the law. The Mann Act conspiracies charged in the S2 Indictment each require proof that Ms. Maxwell acted with the intent that the alleged victim would "engage in sexual