Epstein Secrets

RETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO THE S2 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C.

rd Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

8 Wall.) 163 (1873) 18 North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969) 18 United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) United States v. Bortnovsky, passim 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987) 22, 23 United States v. Brown, No. 99-1230(L), 2002 WL 34244994 (2d Cir. Apr. 26, 2002) 16 United States v

District of New York By Electronic Mail Christian Everdell, Esq. Mark Cohen, Esq. Cohen & Gresser LLP New York, NY 10022 Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon Mor an and Foreman, P.C. Denver, CO 80203 Dear Counsel: The Si!lo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10

ew York, NY 10022 Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon Mor an and Foreman, P.C. Denver, C

vent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should [the defendant] be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Indictment contains a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offenses charged, and it des

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. 123 EFTA

ould consider not just the text of the Indictment, but also discovery and other information supplied to the defendant to date. See United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987); see also, e.g., United States v. Pierre-Louis, 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) (d

Attorney Southern District of New York By Electronic Mail Christian Everdell, Esq. Mark Cohen, Esq. Cohen & Gresser LLP Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon Mor an and Foreman, P.C. Dear Counsel: The Silvio I. Motto Building January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C.

vent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should [the defendant] be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Indictment contains a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offenses charged, and it des

on of the allegations specified below in order to permit Ms. Maxwell to prepare her defense and avoid unfair surprise at trial. See United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Superseding Indictment does not sufficiently inform Ms. Maxwell of the specific conduct of which she is accu

or your prompt response to these requests. Sincerely, /s/ Christian Everdell Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP cc: Mark S. Cohen, Esq. Jeff Pagliuca, Esq. Laura Menninger, Esq. Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq. EFTA00030937

s Attorney Southern District of New York By Electronic Mail Christian Everdell, Esq. Mark Cohen, Esq. ohen & Gresser LLP Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon Mor an and Foreman, P.C. Dear Counsel: The Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 January 10, 2

vent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should [the defendant] be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Indictment contains a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offenses charged, and it des