Epstein Secrets

MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OFFERED BY THE GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 404(b) FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULE'S NOTICE REQUIREMENT Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver CO 80203 Phone: Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Th

LY WITH THE RULE'S NOTICE REQUIREMENT Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

HORITIES Cases United States v. Brand, 467 F.3d 179 (2d Cir. 2006) 4 United States v. Bid, 859 F. App'x 610 (2d Cir. 2021) 4 Other Authorities Wright & Miller, 22B Fed. Prac. & Proc. Evid., § 5242.1 2020 Amendments to Rule 404(b) (2021) 2, 6 Rules Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) passim ii EFTA00105956 Ghislai

EFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE IN TOTO CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS DESIGNATED BY PLAINTIFF FOR USE AT TRIAL Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 EFTA00595612 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell") files h

7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MAG NA 0 LEGAL SERVICES EFTA00595627 2 3 INDEX Page 4 Examination by Mr. Edwards 4 Examination by Mr. Pagliuca 57 5 Further Examination by Mr. Edwards 68 6 7 8 EXHIBITS 9 Deposition Exhibit 1 6 Police Interview 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1

m and foundation. 3 EFTA00595615 THE WITNESS: Yes. He wasn't always friendly See Menninger Decl., Ex. F, 10:6-14; 43:15-44:4 As explained in in Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedures, the use of a document during testimony to refresh recollections is limited: The law also places limits on how cou

SLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Intr

Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 Ea

ct of amendment on the parties, the court must consider "the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute." 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 1488, p. 814 (3d ed. 2010). Justice does not require amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will no