3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
ly limited to restitution, as many other CVRA rights clearly apply before conviction.''* Reviewing these two cases in an extended, published opinion, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas noted that reading these two decisions as standing for the proposition that charges must be filed for CVRA rights
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014058 →, 689 (1972)). 1© See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). 7 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 n.15 (citing Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363, 366 n.6 (D.C. Cir. 1965)),; see WAYNE R. LAFAVE ET AL., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 6.4(e), at 670 (3d ed. 2007) (“There is
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014069 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
er prosecutors formally file [*68] criminal charges? Or do they attach at some earlier point in the process? Does v. United States, a federal case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, usefully illustrates the issue. *° In that case, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florid
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017609 →, 689 (1972)). 76 See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). ” OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 n.15 (citing Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363, 366 n.6 (D.C. Cir. 1965)); see Wayne R. LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.4(e), at 670 (3d ed. 2007) ("There is a
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017624 →ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
ra Lyn Bassett, Recusal and the Supreme Court, 56 Hastings L.J_ 657, 678-79 (2005) (citing United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 211-12 & n.12 (1980); Hanrahan v. Hampton, 446 U.S. 1301, 1301 (1980)). 255 Model R. Prof] Conduct 4.4(a) (2007); see also ABA Criminal Justice Study, Standard 4-4.3 (1993). 256
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017668 →ral courts have the inherent power to request attorneys to represent indigent crime victims. An illustration of this power is found in a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina in United States v. Stamper. *8 In this rape case, a dispute arose over the admission of certain psychiatr
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693 →Entities connected to both Hanrahan and U.S. District Court

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSONDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Harvey Weinstein
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION
Paul Cassell
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Michigan
LOCATION
New York
LOCATIONJack Goldberger
PERSON