Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S
gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S
gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed
t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both Rubin and v. Lir Joe Records
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON296 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Marc Rich
PERSON150 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
George W. Bush
PERSON91 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
United States
LOCATION91 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON80 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Joe Biden
PERSON61 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON58 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON54 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON51 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
the Southern District
LOCATION48 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON47 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Prince Charles
PERSON41 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON41 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
New York
LOCATION37 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Paul Cassell
PERSON37 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
GA
Garcia
PERSON30 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
WA
Walker
PERSON27 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Hunter Biden
PERSON26 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
Michael Douglas
PERSON26 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.
TH
Thompson
PERSON26 w/ Rubin·3 w/ v.