Epstein Secrets

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 18 MR. EDWARDS: No, there are limitations. I think in my reply I refer to the case of U.S. V. Rubin where they discussed that very scenario stating there at least has to be criminal charges contemplate by the government before these rights kick

4 EFTA00212750 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 5 why the FBI got involved because Michael Feeter wrote a scathing letter to the State Attorney about Mr. Epstein receiving preferencial treatment by local authorities. Before the FBI took the ca

is no threat to the public. Due to the ongoing nature of the investigation, there is no further comment at this time." WCHS (ABC-8/Fox-11) (11/20, Rubin) also reported on the story. EFTA01656116 Kansas City Police, FBI, U.S. Marshals Service Arrest 38 in Massive Crime Sweep WDAF (Fox-4) (11/20, Fr

son time if convicted." Bloomberg (11/20, Murphy), the Record (11/20, Greig), Bleeping Computer (11/20, Gatlan), TechCrunch (11/20, Franceschi), the Register (11/20, Thomson), Law 360 (11/20, Scharf), KBTX (CBS-3) (11/20, Surette), UPI (11/20, Heuer), Axios (11/20, Sabin), Cointelegraph (11/20, Coghlan),

t 361-63 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 19 of 1/1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rubin where they discussed that very scenario stating there at least has to be criminal charges contemplate by the government before these rights kick i

Beach-- 23 Town of Palm Beach Police, not the Sheriff's Office. 24 MR. EDWARDS: I'm sorry, Judge. And that's 25 why the FBI got involved because Michael Feeter I Page 4 OFFICIAL REPORTING SERVICES, LLC (954) 467-8204 EFTA00184735 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-63 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016

emo, supra note 2, at 15. 163 Iq 164 See, e.g., Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330, 339 (1979). HOU

district court decisions, which provides further support for the conclusion that the CVRA applies before charges have been filed. In United States v. Rubin,” victims of a federal securities fraud argued that they had CVRA rights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific

victims who are entitled to 63 Td. 4 See, e.g., Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330,339 (1979). 6 OL

isions, which provides further 79 victims of a support for the conclusion that the CVRA applies before charges have been filed. In United States v. Rubin, federal securities fraud argued that they had CVRA rights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affec