Epstein Secrets

EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimile Florida Bar No.: E-mail: and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Universit of Utah a Salt Lake Cit , UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 40 EFTA00207919

distinguish Dean, it asks this Court to decline to follow the Fifth Circuit's holding and create a split of authority on this important issue. See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2-3. Instead, the Government would have this Court deviate from the Fifth Circuit's well-reasoned opinion because the Circuit's "discussion of

1 Respectfully Submitted, pi Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, & LEHRMAN. P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro Rae Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 41 EFTA00208414 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket

Fifth Circuit's decision is that the Circuit did not directly quote three words found in the CVRA's right to confer — the words "in the case." See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2. But the Fifth Circuit had received briefs totaling close to 100 pages in that case and was obviously well aware of the statute at hand. Inde

their concerns to your attention. Very truly yours, FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Bradley J. Edwards Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah• BJE: mwk Enclosures This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and i

distinguish Dean, it asks this Court to decline to follow the Fifth Circuit's holding and create a split of authority on this important issue. See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2-3. Instead, the Government would have this Court deviate from the Fifth Circuit's well-reasoned opinion because the Circuit's "discussion of

ly Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS. FIST LEHRMAN. P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 40 EFTA00235790 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The foregoing document was served o

distinguish Dean, it asks this Court to decline to follow the Fifth Circuit's holding and create a split of authority on this important issue. See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2-3. Instead, the Government would have this Court deviate from the Fifth Circuit's well-reasoned opinion because the Circuit's "discussion of

ed, FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, F.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and Pro Hoc Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 41 EFTA00079033 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 0

Fifth Circuit's decision is that the Circuit did not directly quote three words found in the CVRA's right to confer — the words "in the case." See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2. But the Fifth Circuit had received briefs totaling close to 100 pages in that case and was obviously well aware of the statute at hand. Inde

301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: cassellnalaw.utah,edu

distinguish Dean, it asks this Court to decline to follow the Fifth Circuit's holding and create a split of authority on this important issue. See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2-3. Instead, the Government would have this Court deviate from the Fifth Circuit's well-reasoned opinion because the Circuit's "discussion of

301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected]

distinguish Dean, it asks this Court to decline to follow the Fifth Circuit's holding and create a split of authority on this important issue. See Gov't Response to Emergency Petn. at 2-3. Instead, the Government would have this Court deviate from the Fifth Circuit's well-reasoned opinion because the Circuit's "discussion of