Epstein Secrets

the least egregious conduct proscribed by the Montana stat- ute tngi6 must qualify as an offense "rela ' o ... sexual abuse." See id. at 1206-07; Valencia Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1046, 1052 & n. 3 (9th Cir.2 ). If such conduct does not qualify, the Montana statute is over-inclusive on its face. The Mon

ages of a prepubescent fe- male known as Jane Doe. Images of this young girl had been found on several individuals' computers and were labeled with Jane Doe's actual name. NCMEC analysts used this information to locate the girl in Indianapolis, Indiana. Law enforcement officials interviewed Jane Doe. Sh

. Moulder, 141 F.3d at 571; Price, 95 F.3d at 367; United States v. Laday, 56 F.3d 24, 26 (5th Cir.1995); Wittie, 25 F.3d at 262; United States v. Valencia, 985 F.2d 758, 760 (5th Cir.I993). The government argues that the appropri- C 2009 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. https://web2.

d on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 5 of 11 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Background Defendant Epstein has filed a boilerplate motion to strike Jane Doe's trial date — and numerous other consolidated cases involving similar allegations of his sexual abuse of minors - for an unspecified period of time,

. Centner, 116 F.3d 473 (Table), 1997 WI. 328766, at *2 (4th Cir.1997); United States v. Leder, 23 F.3d 586, 591 (1st Cir.1994); United Stales v. Valencia, 907 F.2d 671, 680 (7th Cir. 1990); United States v. Gallishcaa 428 F2d 760 (2d Cir.I970). [4] As noted, there is sufficient evi- dence to allow a

affirm the judgment of the District Court. John DOE # 1; Kelly Doe # 1, Parents of Jane Doe # 1, Individually and as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; Kelly Doe # 2, Parents of Jane Doe # 2, as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 2 I William Lawson CHAMBERLIN, Jr.; Kathr