Epstein Secrets

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) Service List Steven C. Marks, Esq. (FBN 516414) Peter Prieto, Esq. (FBN 501492 John Gravante, Esq. FBN 617113) PODHURST ORSECK, Attorneys for Plaintiff City National bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Sui

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

e, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) Service List Steven C. Marks, Esq. (FBN 516414) Peter Prieto, Esq. (FBN 501492 John Gravante, Esq. FBN 617113) PODHURST ORSECK, Attorneys for Plaintiff City National bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Sui

t, Jeffrey Epstein, and asserts as follows. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's Motion to Deposit Funds Into the Court Registry, but offers this Response to provide some context to Defendant's seemingly prompt action in seeking to deposit $2 million into the Court's registry. Defendant would have this

Dated: Mary 26, 2010 Respectfully Submitted, PODHURST ORSECK, PA. Attorneys for Plaintiff 25 West Flagier Street Suite 800 3313 / Fax By: w Peter Prieto Steven C. Marks (FB# 516414) Peter Prieto (FB# 501492) John Gravante, lII (FB# 617113) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEIREBYCERTIFY thaton May 26,2010,