Epstein Secrets

of the breach and then move forward with Epstein's prosecution. Accordingly, the undersigned would agree with Epstein's statement at page 4 of its Response, that the fact there exists a Non-Prosecution Agreement does not mean that Epstein is free from future criminal prosecution, and that in fact, "the

e No. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Page 14 of 14 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP (561) 515-31 ax By: R D. Critton, Jr. orida Bar #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA00723232 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEA

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

EFTA00725565 Page 8 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcritPbciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

h day of May 2010: Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 EFTA00729131 Page 8 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN. CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ax (Counsel for Defendan

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

h day of May 2010: Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 EFTA00729139 Page 8 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN. CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/515-3148 Fax (Counse

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

on this 27th day of May, 2010: EFTA00614565 Page 8 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. 1.111.4162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. 11111. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 FL 33401 Phone Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) Se

of the breach and then move forward with Epstein's prosecution. Accordingly, the undersigned would agree with Epstein's statement at page 4 of its Response, that the fact there exists a Non-Prosecution Agreement does not mean For internal use only For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED.

t al, Miami, FL USA; Robert C. Josefsberg, LEAD ATTORNEY, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Miami, FL USA. For Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant (9:09-cv-80591-KAM): Michael James Pike, LEAD ATTORNEY, Pike & Lustig, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL; Robert Deweese Critton, Jr., LEAD ATTORNEY, Critton Luttier ["7] & Coleman, West Palm Beac

of the breach and then move forward with Epstein's prosecution. Accordingly, the undersigned would agree with Epstein's statement at page 4 of its Response, that the fact there exists a Non-Prosecution Agreement does not mean For internal use only For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED.

t al, Miami, FL USA; Robert C. Josefsberg, LEAD ATTORNEY, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Miami, FL USA. For Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant (9:09-cv-80591-KAM): Michael James Pike, LEAD ATTORNEY, Pike & Lustig, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL; Robert Deweese Critton, Jr., LEAD ATTORNEY, Critton Luttier ["7] & Coleman, West Palm Beac

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY D COMES NOW, Intervener, B.B. and file this Response t ndant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it. P mg on the production of the NM agre

00, West Palm Beach, FL 334101; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. LE0P0LD-KUVIN, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Be Gardens FL l0 By: E