Epstein Secrets

an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald v. Southern Fann Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, 'in the absence of strong indicia of contrary cong

an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald v. Southern Fann Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, 'in the absence of strong indicia of contrary cong

an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald v. Southern Fann Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, `in the absence of strong indicia of contrary cong