Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply
recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply
recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply
recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply
recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (165)
Entities connected to both Thompson and Hendricks v. Stark
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON193 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Hendricks
United States
LOCATION91 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Hendricks
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON86 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON82 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Hendricks
George W. Bush
PERSON74 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Hendricks
Joe Biden
PERSON64 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
the Southern District
LOCATION50 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
Marc Rich
PERSON49 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Hendricks
Prince Charles
PERSON49 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
New York
LOCATION47 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON43 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
Bradley Edwards
PERSON42 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON41 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
WA
Walker
PERSON40 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Hendricks
Phoenix
LOCATION37 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
Murray
PERSON33 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON30 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Hendricks
SA
Santobello
PERSON27 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Hendricks
RU
Rubin
PERSON26 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks
Hunter Biden
PERSON25 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Hendricks