Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
District to refrain from tampering with indictments."' United States v. Bin Laden, 91 F. Supp. 2d 600, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will be granted only where the challenged allegations are
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
District to refrain from tampering with indictments."' United States v. Bin Laden, 91 F. Supp. 2d 600, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will be granted only where the challenged allegations are
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
District to refrain from tampering with indictments."' United States v. Bin Laden, 91 F. Supp. 2d 600, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will be granted only where the challenged allegations are
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
District to refrain from tampering with indictments."' United States v. Bin Laden, 91 F. Supp. 2d 600, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will be granted only where the challenged allegations are
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Jimenez and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON43 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON30 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION27 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Colorado
LOCATION20 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION20 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Bill Richardson
PERSON19 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Chris Tucker
PERSON19 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
North Carolina
LOCATION19 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
TH
Thompson
PERSON18 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON20 w/ Jimenez·2 w/ N.Y.
WA
Walsh
PERSON18 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON18 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Oregon
LOCATION17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Martinez
PERSON17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Eric Schmidt
PERSON17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Rivera
PERSON16 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON16 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ N.Y.