Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y thus establishing probable cause that the defendant committed the crimes of sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy. Sags United States v. Contreras, 776 F.2d 51, 55 (2d Cir. 1985) ("[A]n indictment returned by a duly constituted grand jury conclusively establishes the existence of probable cause
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y thus establishing probable cause that the defendant committed the crimes of sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy. Sags United States v. Contreras, 776 F.2d 51, 55 (2d Cir. 1985) ("[A]n indictment returned by a duly constituted grand jury conclusively establishes the existence of probable cause
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y thus establishing probable cause that the defendant committed the crimes of sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy. Sags United States v. Contreras, 776 F.2d 51, 55 (2d Cir. 1985) ("[A]n indictment returned by a duly constituted grand jury conclusively establishes the existence of probable cause
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y thus establishing probable cause that the defendant committed the crimes of sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy. Sags United States v. Contreras, 776 F.2d 51, 55 (2d Cir. 1985) ("[A]n indictment returned by a duly constituted grand jury conclusively establishes the existence of probable cause
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both Contreras and Interstate Facilities
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON69 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
United States
LOCATION49 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
Michael Jackson
PERSON47 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION43 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
Julie K. Brown
PERSON35 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION35 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
the Southern District
LOCATION34 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
New York State
LOCATION32 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
George Mitchell
PERSON31 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
LA
LaFontaine
PERSON30 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION29 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
New York
LOCATION28 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
Amber Southerland
PERSON28 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
Jes Staley
PERSON28 w/ Contreras·3 w/ Interstate
MA
Martir
PERSON20 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
The New York Post
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
VA
Valerio
PERSON18 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
United Kingdom
LOCATION17 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
OR
Orena
PERSON16 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION16 w/ Contreras·4 w/ Interstate