Epstein Secrets

te process because the litigants and the courts assume that the sole purpose of discovery is to assist trial preparation") (quoting United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441 (11'h Cir. 1986; emphasis in original). See also Anderson, 799 F.2d at 1441 ("Historically, discovery materials were not avail

(S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on relevancy grounds); Duncan v. Phoenix Supported Living, Inc., No. 2:05-cv-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 US. Dist. LEXIS 66742, at "9-11 (finding settlement communications non-discoverable as "not .. likely

vate process because the litigants and the courts assume that the sole purpose of discovery is to assist trial preparation") (quoting United States" Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441 (11th Cir. 1986; emphasis in original). See also Anderson, 799 F.2d at 1441 ("Historically, discovery materials were not avail

1 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on relevancy grounds); Duncan,. Phoenix Supported Living, Inc., No. 2:05-cv-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 US. Dist. LEXIS 66742, at "9-11 (finding settlement communications non-discoverable as "not .. likely

process because the litigants and the courts assume that the sole purpose of discovery is to assist trial preparation.") (quoting United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441 (1 1 th Cir. 1986; emphasis in original). See also Anderson, 799 F.2d at 1441 ("Historically, discovery materials were not ava

(S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on relevancy grounds); Duncan v. Phoenix Supported Living, Inc., No. 2:05cvl W.D. ( N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 U.S. Dist. (continued...) -5- EFTA00605755 rarely admissible as evidence at trial, see, e.g, Lase

e process because the litigants and the courts assume that the sole purpose of discovery is to assist trial preparation.") (quoting United States'. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441(11'h Cir. 1986; emphasis in original). See also Anderson, 799 F.2d at 1441 ("Historically, discovery materials were not availa

31 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on relevancy grounds); Duncan' Phoenix Supported Living, Inc., No. 2:05cvl (W.D. N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 U.S. Dist. (continued...) -5- EFTA00191294 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 247 Entered on FLSD Dock