Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
63. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt. No. 335 at 24-30, and by Judge Cote in United States v. Torres, No. 20-CR-608 (
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
63. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt. No. 335 at 24-30, and by Judge Cote in United States v. Torres, No. 20-CR-608 (
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
63. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt. No. 335 at 24-30, and by Judge Cote in United States v. Torres, No. 20-CR-608 (
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00016474
63. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt. No. 335 at 24-30, and by Judge Cote in United States v. Torres, No. 20-CR-608 (
Page: EFTA00016474 →Page EFTA00016478
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
Page: EFTA00016478 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (57)
Entities connected to both Mulder and Engelmayer
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON16 w/ Mulder·70 w/ Engelmayer
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·32 w/ Engelmayer
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON15 w/ Mulder·24 w/ Engelmayer
Prince Andrew
PERSON7 w/ Mulder·21 w/ Engelmayer
Rivera
PERSON10 w/ Mulder·18 w/ Engelmayer
Audrey Strauss
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·23 w/ Engelmayer
Julie K. Brown
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·12 w/ Engelmayer
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·14 w/ Engelmayer
United States
LOCATION16 w/ Mulder·8 w/ Engelmayer
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Engelmayer
FI
Fisher
PERSON10 w/ Mulder·7 w/ Engelmayer
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Engelmayer
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Mulder·7 w/ Engelmayer
Torres
PERSON9 w/ Mulder·7 w/ Engelmayer
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Mulder·10 w/ Engelmayer
George W. Bush
PERSON12 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Engelmayer
Bradley Edwards
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·2 w/ Engelmayer
the Southern District
LOCATION10 w/ Mulder·2 w/ Engelmayer
TH
Thompson
PERSON10 w/ Mulder·2 w/ Engelmayer
White Plains
LOCATION2 w/ Mulder·10 w/ Engelmayer