Epstein Secrets

an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein was the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, PA. 2. Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. was a law firm with offices located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and el

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to

an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein was the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. 2. Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. was a law firm with offices located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and e

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and ■.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to th

s an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein wilt& Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, CR-COHN 14.6.alS1 RA ! c, 1U1D{ 6WCZARI • - FILED by DEC 0 1 2009; STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U. S. DIST. CT. S. D. of FLA. - FT. LAUD. Roth

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to

is Information are realleged and expressly incorporated herein as if set forth in full. THE ENTERPRISE 2. The law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, Y.A. (hereinafter referred to as RRA) was a legal entity organized under the laws of the State of Florida and constituted an Enterprise as that te

TEIN, EDWARDS and L.M. possessed ulterior motives or purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, or perverted use of process. 72. As a result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s actions, EPSTEIN suffered damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff EPSTEIN respectfully demands the entry of a judgment for damages against all th