Epstein Secrets

ay. Three of 3 the cases, of the Epstein cases resided within that 4 firm, at least that are filed cases. And 5 Mr. Edwards, Mr. Berger and Mr. Adler have shown 6 on their behalf, on behalf of the Plaintiffs in 7 those particular cases. 8 The news media has reported it as well, and 9 it's b

ITTON: Judge, I think, from a 20 practical standpoint, with regard to the 21 preservation of evidence, the Federal Court order 22 takes care of the Federal Court did not deal 23 with Mr. Edwards at all; although, he was agreeable 24 to entering into a preservation order, because they 25 said it appears t

e. 22 MR. STETTIN: Jurisdiction, in fact, is in 23 the bankruptcy court over the assets of the debtor. 2 4 That's the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler firm. 25 This Court's continuing jurisdiction will be, 4 .61111•••••• (561) 832-7500 2 (Pages 2 to 5) PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. (56

that order was entered prior to Mr. Stettin being appointed last week, so... 711E COURT: All right. MR. LICHTMAN: Your Honor, we repie:,ented to the Federal Court and the state court that of course we're preserving evidence. THE COURT: Okay. All right. Is there anyone else that wishes to be heard? No. So w

well-founded belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm (the "Ponzi scheme"). Roth

t the exact time, according to both Rothstein and the Federal government, that the Ponzi scheme was unraveling. Just days before the RRA implosion, the Federal Court rejected Edwards's bond motion, stating that it was "entirely devoid of evidence." Finally, while Epstein's suit was pending against Edwards, Scott

an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein was the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. 2. Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. was a law firm with offices located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and e

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied in a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00729489 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

s an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein wilt& Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, CR-COHN 14.6.alS1 RA ! c, 1U1D{ 6WCZARI • - FILED by DEC 0 1 2009; STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U. S. DIST. CT. S. D. of FLA. - FT. LAUD. Roth

hat all deadlines in this Order arc satisfied in a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 016 EFTA00795673 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

ingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott ROthateirtalded by.other lawyerS and employees:at the firth of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler,. P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, In betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties' o their 6wn debts and professional dbligatibna to

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied In a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00223353 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may bo enforced in either venue; and 29