Epstein Secrets

800XXXXMBAG Second Amended Complaint that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research on the causes of actions against Epstein. On August 14, 2009, Edwards sent an email to RRA attor

signatures and a fundamental corruption of the many legal protections that the legal system has in place. The law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA") defrauded investors by what Scott Rothstein characterized as legal extortion. He defrauded investors by convincing them into purchasin

L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jane Doe #2"), 50- 2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB (collectively, the "Epstein Actions"). 9. The lead attorney for RRA handling the Epstein Actions was Defendant Edwards. 10. Beginning in approximately the spring of 2009 through Oct

causes of action against Epstein. On that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research on the causes of actions against Epstein. On August 14, 2009, Edwards sent an email to RRA attor

s that the legal system has in place. By claiming to be engaged in what is tantamount to legal extortion, the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA") defrauded investors, convincing them into purchasing fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements, including thos

L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jane Doe #2"), 50- 2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB (collectively, the "Epstein Actions"). 9. The lead attorney for RRA handling the Epstein Actions was Defendant Edwards. 10. Beginning in approximately the spring of 2009 through Oct

time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein. The deposition of Scott Rothstein was taken in the bankruptcy proceeding of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler ("RRA"), but not completed, from December 12, 2011 through December 7 EFTA00808032 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXM

Epstein and settlements in those cases (191 48-52); invocation of the Fifth Amendment by Epstein and alleged co-conspirators in depositions taken in the "Epstein Actions" M., ■., and Jane Doe) and other similar lawsuits (111 54-58); "blocking" of discovery by various witnesses (9191 59-66); Epstein's purported asso