Epstein Secrets

nt on with regard to a Fonti scheme in which he was not an investor. MO are also contending nothing about what went on at Rothstein, Rosenfoldt 4 Adler can form the basis for a claim because of the litigation privilege, absolute immunity of the litigation privilege. So the defense -- excuse me th

:17 actual 30:17 44:13 add 52:4 added 46:25 80:10 adding 30:14 additional 66:7 address 4:11 25:9 adduced 32:22 adequacy 13:11 adequate 65:6 Adler 32:11 Administration 19:18 administrative 53:4 admire 41:4 admissible 24:1 adverse 87:13,19 aforesaid 1:21 afraid 16:5 AG 73:23 age 4:1 ag

RE ^ docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil 9 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: Procedure 1.440 first. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0 not, there is ono agre

d by the firm to work with 4 Stove Abrams in opening up the office here. 5 Q Did you then interview with the firm of 4 Rothstein, Rosenfoldt a Adler? 7 A Yea. Stuart and I talked, and then ho 4 introduced ma to Scott Rothstein, and that was the • interview I had. 10 Rothstein and I talked

here in 2008 you faced the economic reality of having to leave the bench. where did you than go? A I was hired by the Rothstein, Rosonfoldt a Adler firm. O How did that cone about? A As I said, I was interviewing with two firms. 10 There wore two largo firma that had offices in Palm Beach

1,8 61:6,8,18 61:21 62:3,8,24 62:25 86:16,19 shareholders 24:1,7 24:12 28:8 60:20 60:23 62:17,20 shares 61:12,15 sharing 43:20 sheriff 66:11 SHIPLEY 2:15 shock 30:4 158:16 shocked 28:24 shoes 27:1 shooting 11:9 shop 7:18 shots 45:9 show40:2 117:24 133:14 145:20,22 149:15 showed 16:16 58:

11:24 carte 32:1 Clerk 6:1 22:12 42:23 address 23:4 33:11 appears 7:16 8:3 before 1:13 9:22 13:20 case I:4 4:24,25 5:6 46:21,24 47:13 48:2,4 Adler 1:5 3:7 11:21 appellate 21:14,16,19 20:7,22 21:12 31:4 13:19 24:23 26:24 48:7 49:5 administrative 12:22 21:20 23:14 35:2 36:15 44:21 29:17 31

equestration 34:20 serious 17:18 served 31:17 serving 12:23 set 25:25 41:11 setting 46:7 seven 26:5 40:11,13 41:25 sexual 42:5 Shapiro 5:13 SHIPLEY 2:4 short 16:7 Shorthand 50:8 show 5:9 15:10,20 16:13 31:17 32:21 33:16,19 34:7 35:1 38:18,18 40:19 41:10 46:19 showed 36:20 showing 35:1 s

s justifiable belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm. Rothstein himself admitted to, a

581 75 31:12 41:20,21 resulted (1) 26:1 review (3) 10:13 26:17 44:9 46:6 56:21 Sasser's (5) second (3) 25:11 29:9 31:20 securities (1) SHIPLEY (1) 2:18 shoes (2) 52:10,11 31:13 34:3 59:4 sorry (2) 8:20 29:8 sort (1) 35:13 57:15 26:9,11 29:14 33:10 short (1) 33:20 59:17 43:11 47