Epstein Secrets

800XXXXMBAG Second Amended Complaint that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research on the causes of actions against Epstein. On August 14, 2009, Edwards sent an email to RRA attor

signatures and a fundamental corruption of the many legal protections that the legal system has in place. The law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA") defrauded investors by what Scott Rothstein characterized as legal extortion. He defrauded investors by convincing them into purchasin

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The P

causes of action against Epstein. On that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research on the causes of actions against Epstein. On August 14, 2009, Edwards sent an email to RRA attor

s that the legal system has in place. By claiming to be engaged in what is tantamount to legal extortion, the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA") defrauded investors, convincing them into purchasing fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements, including thos

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The P

time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein. The deposition of Scott Rothstein was taken in the bankruptcy proceeding of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler ("RRA"), but not completed, from December 12, 2011 through December 7 EFTA00808032 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaint

ad Edwards while at the law firm of Brad Edwards and associates. 5. In or about April of 2009, Brad Edwards went to work for Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), and his cases, including the case of L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, became cases of the RRA law firm. 6. The case of L.M. versus Jeffrey Epstein

rsigned has called up for hearing the following: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER DATE: Monday, April 19, 2010 TIME: 8:45 A.M. JUDGE: The Honorable David F. Crow PLACE: Palm Beach County Courthouse, Room 9C EFTA00728315 Notice of Hearing CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct co

The critical nature of these documents is vividly demonstrated by Rothstein's testimony during his recent deposition that he had asked Edwards or Adler to specifically set aside a flight manifest for an Epstein private jet. (Tr. Rothstein Depo 12/21/11 at 2278). Rothstein further testified that he

PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaint