Epstein Secrets

an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein was the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, PA. 2. Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. was a law firm with offices located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and el

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein was the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. 2. Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. was a law firm with offices located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and e

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

s an attorney admitted to practice law in Florida. Defendant Rothstein wilt& Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, CR-COHN 14.6.alS1 RA ! c, 1U1D{ 6WCZARI • - FILED by DEC 0 1 2009; STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U. S. DIST. CT. S. D. of FLA. - FT. LAUD. Roth

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

is Information are realleged and expressly incorporated herein as if set forth in full. THE ENTERPRISE 2. The law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, Y.A. (hereinafter referred to as RRA) was a legal entity organized under the laws of the State of Florida and constituted an Enterprise as that te

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions, 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009. article as saying that he had met with, ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious.

ingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott ROthateirtalded by.other lawyerS and employees:at the firth of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler,. P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, In betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties' o their 6wn debts and professional dbligatibna to

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H