Epstein Secrets

, Florida, Case No. 09-062943 (19); Lawsuit filed November 20, 2009. 4. All Depositions taken of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR. 5. The videotaped deposition and all exhibits as referenced/used in the Deposition of Scott W. Rothstein taken by Epstein on Ju

time 8. Paul Cassell Borton Petrini, LLP 1320 Columbia Street, Suite 210 San Diego, California 92101-3436 9. Margaret Berk 5925 Kaiser Lane Pensacola, FL 32507-8319 10. Mercedes Estrada Rosenfeldt & Birken, P.A. 100 S.E. 3rd Avenue Suite 1300 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 11. Jacquie Johnson A

ion for abuse of process, arising out of a fraudulent Ponzi scheme perpetrated by attorneys and staff of the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler ("RRA"), where Edwards was a partner who prosecuted actions against Epstein which were marketed by RRA to investors with the promise of multi-millio

e is a pure question of law to be determined by the court under the facts and circumstances of each case.'" Id. (citations omitted) (citing City of Pensacola v. Owens, 369 So.2d 328 (Fla.1979)). Grounds for Reconsideration The detailed and documented facts from Epstein's affidavit quoted below, along wi

d other media outlets reported that Scott Rothstein had fled to Morocco to evade criminal prosecution for using his law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), to perpetrate a massive Ponzi scheme. It was widely reported that RRA, Rothstein and other conspirators whose identities had not yet been

se is a pure question of law to be determined by the court under the facts and circumstances of each case.'" Id. (citations omitted) (citing City of Pensacola v. Owens, 369 So.2d 328 (Fla.1979)). UNDISPUTED GROUNDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The well-documented and undisputed facts in existence at the time Eps

othstein, the partner of plaintiff Brad Edwards, had fled to Morocco to evade criminal prosecution for using their law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), to perpetrate a massive Ponzi scheme. It was widely reported that RRA, Rothstein, Rothstein's partners and other co-conspirators whose iden

on of law to be determined by the court under the facts and circumstances 16 EFTA00583967 of each case.'" Id. (citations omitted) (citing City of Pensacola v. Owens, 369 So.2d 328 (Fla.1979)). UNDISPUTED GROUNDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The reasonable suspicion that gives rise to probable cause for Epstei