Epstein Secrets

egally.' When other plea arrangements have been negotiated in violation of law, they have been stricken by the courts. For example, United States v. Walker, 98 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. 1996), held that where a sentence on a new crime could not run concurrently with a probation revocation the defendant was th

sing with those that it does not. 9 Epstein, however, has sent in his surrogates to litigate in this case, including his criminal defense attorneys Roy Black et al. and an attorney who has represented persons close to him, Bruce Reinhart. 20 EFTA00304761 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 127 Entered on FLSD D

llegally.' When other plea arrangements have been negotiated in violation of law, they have been stricken by the courts. For example, United States. Walker, 98 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. 1996), held that where a sentence on a new crime could not run concurrently with a probation revocation the defendant was th

sing with those that it does not. 9 Epstein, however, has sent in his surrogates to litigate in this case, including his criminal defense attorneys Roy Black et al. and an attorney who has represented persons close to him, qtr 20 EFTA00204911 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/

n in situations where defendants may have relied on those arrangements. See Victims' Summary Judgment Mot. at 37-39 (citing, e.g., United States v. Walker, 98 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. 1996); United States v. 25 EFTA00178081 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 26 of 2

The defense attorneys have no interest in that "transaction" — it concerns only the crime victims, the Government, and Jeffrey Epstein. Simply put, Roy Black et al. have no recognized "interest" in whether or not the Court finds that the Government failed (for example) to confer with Jane Doc #1 and Jane Doe #