Epstein Secrets

008 7 06/06/2008 8 06/11/2008 9 06/13/2008 10 06/13/2008 11 06/20/2008 12 06/20/2008 13 06/24/2008 14 06/30/2008 15 07/01/2008 16 Robert Deweese Critton , Jr. ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 USA Fax: LEAD ATT

10/06/2008 46 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 10/24/2008 (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 10/06/2008) 10/24/2008 47 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 46 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 42 Am

80119-KAM et al.(Kudman, Tama) (Entered: 03/12/2010) 488 Defendant% MOTION for Reconsideration re 480 Order on Motion to Compel and/or Request for Rule 4 Review and Appeal of Portions of the Magistrate's Order by Jeffrey Epstein. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 03/15/2010) 489 Plaintif

[email protected], [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected], [email protected], bertpatton®podhurst.com, [email protected] Robert Deweese Critton , Jr [email protected], [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected], jarbour®sexabuseattomey.com, [email protected]

r: Jeffrey Epstein Document Number:488 Docket Text: Defendant's MOTION for Reconsideration re [480] Order on Motion to Compel and/or Request for Rule 4 Review and Appeal of Portions of the Magistrate's Order by Jeffrey Epstein. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A)(Pike, Michael) 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM Notice has be

radley J. Edwards SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Isidro Manual Garcia 24 EFTA00207861 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike P

nts of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 . . . .This opinion work product should not be disclosed . . . ." Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and/or Request for Rule 4 Review, case no. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, doc. #477 at 7-8. Epstein also put in a cryptic sentence stating: "Concomitantly, to the extent that the request is now