Epstein Secrets

ocket 04/09/2009 Page 3 of 3 Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON SERVICE LIST Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Attorneys for Defendant Robert Deweese Critton, Jr. [email protected] Michael James Plke Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman Lead Counsel Paul G. Cassell Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldber

0811-KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2609 Page 3 of 6 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File a Response to Defendant's Motion to Stay And Or Continue 6. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstance

.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully submitted, By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar Nb. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 W

RRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, JEItItEY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PROPOSED ORDER This matter came before the Court on Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply to Plaintiffs' Jane Does 2-7 EFTA00727465 Case 9:08-cy-80119-KAM Document 123-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 4 of 5 Re

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e

ected by privacy rights 01808-01809 09/10/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley J. Edwards Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- KAM Doe v. Epstein - Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of th

asonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights O4207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at. Letter to Critton RE: Protective Order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

f the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01808-01809 09/10/2009 I Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- KAM Doe v. Epstein - Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of th