Epstein Secrets

J. MICHAEL BURMAN. P.A." GREGORY W. COLEMAN, PA ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. PA' BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTTI EEL PA JEFFREY C. PENN MICHAEL I. PIKE HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA DAVID A. YAREMA 'FLORIDA BOARD CERTI

l Release ("Settlement Agreement") in order to resolve the pending litigation (the "Litigation") between them as follows: 1. Case No. 09-CV-80591—Marra/Johnson. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-80591 — Marra/J

The First Parties (and any third party family member) agree that Robert Josefsberg or Katherine Ezell are authorized to accept service for them and Robert D. Critton, Jr. is authorized to accept service for Jeffrey Epstein in the event of an enforcement matter. First and Second Parties expressly acknowledge and

Release ("Settlement Agreement") in order to resolve the pending litigation (the "Litigation") between them as follows: 1. Case No. 09-CV-80656— Marra/Johnson. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-80656 — Marra/J

es incurred and for any other relief to which he is entitled under the law. Jury Trial Plaintiff demands Jury Trial on all issues so triable. By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (Counsel for Jeffr

er to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint

a matter of law to the summary judgments sought. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter the summary judgments sought herein. By: re Robert D. Critton. Jr. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PUCE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mnikalclaw.com I HEREBY C

ages in order to property preserve all issues pertaining to the proper application of §2255 for appeal. See C.MA. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80811 Marra/Johnson; and Jane Doe II v. Epstein, Case No. 09-CW-80489 Marra/Johnson. EFTA00207698 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 03 05 20

iew Mr. Josefsberg's outstanding bills on a line-by-line basis and attempt to reach a non- adversarial resolution of all outstanding fee issues. Mr. Critton also transmitted to Mr. Josefsberg an Agreement for Special Master to Determine Amount of Attorneys' Fees and Costs ("Special Master Agreement), si

er to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe I pstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint