Epstein Secrets

bin/DktRptpl?859999798355213-L_801_0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA00175416 CM/ECP -.Live Database - flsd Page 2 of 12 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Robert Deweese Critton , Jr. Burman Critton Luther & Coleman 515 N Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 Amicus United States of America ax: Emai

. (ir) (Entered: 08/25/2008) 09/15/2008 8 r 129.4 KB NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Deweese Critton, Jr on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 09/15/2008) 09/30/2008 9 r 53.1 KB ORDER TO RESPOND re 3 MOTION to keep True Name in Sealed Envelope filed by Jane Doe, 2 M

101 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 25

s a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v, Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000)• Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). See also

The case law is also enclosed. id your Honor have any questions or concerns regarding the foregoing, please contact th 'gned's office. V ours, Critton, Jr. Enclosures cc. Spencer Kuvin, Esq. (via facsimile w/o enclosures) Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. (via facsimile w/o enclosures) • PHONE: • PAX:

paid, this day ofe 1 2-CO9 to Jack A Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 334101; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., MO Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. 1.1 M1 (561) 5 facsimile) •••••...1 By: ENCER KUVIN, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 0089737 ADAM J. LANGINO,

f 22 documents is considered testimonial and is protected by the Fifth Amendment. In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2d Cir. 1993); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976)(issue expressed as whether compliance with a document request or subpoena "tacitly conceded" the item's

02/2009 Page 16 of 16 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger Es . Robert D. Critton, Esq. s/ Adam D. Horowitz -16- EFTA00728216 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 57-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2009 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES

are unknown; or (2) where production would "implicitly authenticate" the documents. In re Grand Jury Subpoena 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2d Cir. 1993); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976) (issue expressed as whether compliance with a document request or subpoena "tacitly conceded" the item's

ating; rather, if anything, it is their contents, which are not protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege so long as they were created voluntarily. Fisher 425 U.S. at 410; see also In `Plaintiff concedes that the act of producing items in response to request no. 9, concerning witness statements, and r

2/2009 Page 16 of 16 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er, Es . Robert D. Critton, Esq. s/ Adam D. Horowitz -16- EFTA00222517

are unknown; or (2) where production would "implicitly authenticate" the documents. In re Grand Jury Subpoena 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2d Cir. 1993); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976) (issue expressed as whether compliance with a document request or subpoena "tacitly conceded" the item's

ating; rather, if anything, it is their contents, which are not protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege so long as they were created voluntarily. Fisher 425 U.S. at 410; see also In `Plaintiff concedes that the act of producing items in response to request no. 9, concerning witness statements, and r

ant Jeffrey Epstein 14 EFTA00222538 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 15 of 15 Page 15 Respec By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcritabcIclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpikeebelclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLE

ubpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (61h Ed.). The priv

that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. United States v. Doe. 465 U.S., at 613. and n. 11. 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher. 425 U.S., at 409-410. 96 S.Ct. 1569; id. at 428. 432. 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States. [487 U.S..1 at 104, 108 S

el James [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL, USA 33401-2918 Fax: Email: MagillNMI Robert Deweese Critton, Jr [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL, USA 33401-2918 Fax: Email: THE COURT UPDA

gel, Martin & Heilbrun; McDermott, Suzanne; Martin, Christopher H; John Does 1 Through 10; Heilbrun, Robert; Gerzog, Lawrence D; Fisher, Ivan; Fisher, Diane DBA the Fisher Group; Fisher & Soffer AKA Fisher & Sophir; Epstein, Jeffrey E; Ellyn Bank; Cohen, Debra Elisa COUNTER-CLAIMANT: Fisher, I

se Siegel; Siegel, Martin & Heilbrun; McDermott, Suzanne; Martin, Christopher H; John Does 1 Through 10; Heilbrun, Robert; Gerzog, Lawrence D; Fisher, Ivan; Fisher, Diane DBA the Fisher Group; Fisher & Soffer AKA Fisher & Sophir; Epstein, Jeffrey E; Ellyn Bank; Cohen, Debra Elisa COUNTER-CLAI

ssing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 By: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS Florida Bar No.: 542075 EFTA00725381 SERVICE LIST Robert D. Critton, Jr. BURMAN, CRITTON, et al. 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jay Howell, Esq. Jay Howell & Assoc. 644 Cesery Boulevar

vers situations where the act of producing documents has "communicative aspects of its own, wholly aside from the contents of the papers produced." Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). But this "act of production" doctrine has stringent limits. It does not extend, for example, to a claim

tlaw cases Box 13: - Not applicable — is actually Operation Sledgehammer Box 14: 10/15/2008 letter from to Dexter Lee Epstein — Docs provided by Critton (redwell) Certified Copy of State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein Plea Conference Epstein v. State of Florida Order 6/27/2008 letter from to Goldbe

; 9/17/07 to Lekowitz; 10/25/07 Sloman Itr to Davis; 11/8/07 Lefkowitz to Sloman; 11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?); 11/28/07 Starr to Fisher; 11/29/07 Starr to Acosta; 11/30/07 Acosta to Lefkowitz; 12/4/07 Acosta to Starr; 12/5/07 Starr to Acosta; 12/6/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz; 12/7/07 Sanc

ctions 86 6/9/2009 Indictment package signed again for presentation on 6/16/2009 6/11/2009 Villafaila Katherine W. Ezell Email re letter from Critton Denying any fees and hearing on 6/12/09 6/12/2009 Goldberger Villafafia Letter re violation of NPA ,- 6/12/2009 Villafafia Lefkowitz Letter r

d ready to unwind the Agreement. B-10 11/30/2007 Kenneth Starr Alex Acosta Letter in response to 11/28/2007 letter to Assistant Attorney General Fisher. Outlines the history of negotiations with various counsel for Epstein illustrating how the Non-Prosecution Agreement was reached. Request to prov

ons 86 6/9/2009 Indictment package signed again for presentation on 6/16/2009 6/11/2009 Villafatia Katherine W. I lizell Email re letter from Critton Denying any fees and hearing on 6/12/09 6/12/2009 Goldberger \ illafafia Letter re violation of NPA 87 6/12/2009 Villafaila 1.efkowitz Lette

ready to unwind the Agreement. B I() 11/30/2007 Kenneth Starr Alex Acosta Letter in response to 11/28/2007 letter to Assistant Attorney General Fisher. Outlines the history of negotiations with various counsel for Epstein illustrating how the Non-Prosecution Agreement was reached. Request to prov