Epstein Secrets

The case law is also enclosed. id your Honor have any questions or concerns regarding the foregoing, please contact th 'gned's office. V ours, Critton, Jr. Enclosures cc. Spencer Kuvin, Esq. (via facsimile w/o enclosures) Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. (via facsimile w/o enclosures) • PHONE: • PAX:

paid, this day ofe 1 2-CO9 to Jack A Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 334101; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., MO Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. 1.1 M1 (561) 5 facsimile) •••••...1 By: ENCER KUVIN, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 0089737 ADAM J. LANGINO,

of the breach and then move forward with Epstein's prosecution. Accordingly, the undersigned would agree with Epstein's statement at page 4 of its Response, that the fact there exists a Non-Prosecution Agreement does not mean that Epstein is free from future criminal prosecution, and that in fact, "the

paid the Plaintiffs. WHEREFORE, the Defendant requests that this Court grant the relief requested and any other relief deemed necessary. By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

f record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 27th day of May 2010: Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 EFTA00729131 Page 8 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN. CRITTON, LUTTIER &

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

f record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 27th day of May 2010: Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 EFTA00729139 Page 8 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN. CRITTON, LUTTIER &

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

paid the Plaintiffs. WHEREFORE, the Defendant requests that this Court grant the relief requested and any other relief deemed necessary. By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically

e Court as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs Response, in its first sentence, indicates that it does not oppose the relief requested. The remainder of the Response is a gratuitous, unnecessary, inflammatory, immaterial, series of misrepresentations regarding the Defendant's intent in offering to deposit $2,000

.A., Miami, FL USA. For Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant (9:09-cv-80591-KAM): Michael James Pike, LEAD ATTORNEY, Pike & Lustig, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL; Robert Deweese Critton, Jr., LEAD ATTORNEY, Critton Luttier ["7] & Coleman, West Palm Beach, FL; Jay P. Lefkowitz, Michael D. Shumsky, PRO HAC VICE, Kirkland & Ellis, Was

of the breach and then move forward with Epstein's prosecution. Accordingly, the undersigned would agree with Epstein's statement at page 4 of its Response, that the fact there exists a Non-Prosecution Agreement does not mean For internal use only For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED.

.A., Miami, FL USA. For Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant (9:09-cv-80591-KAM): Michael James Pike, LEAD ATTORNEY, Pike & Lustig, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL; Robert Deweese Critton, Jr., LEAD ATTORNEY, Critton Luttier ["7] & Coleman, West Palm Beach, FL; Jay P. Lefkowitz, Michael D. Shumsky, PRO HAC VICE, Kirkland & Ellis, Was

of the breach and then move forward with Epstein's prosecution. Accordingly, the undersigned would agree with Epstein's statement at page 4 of its Response, that the fact there exists a Non-Prosecution Agreement does not mean For internal use only For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED.

ralian Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 334101; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. LE0P0LD-KUVIN, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Be

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY D COMES NOW, Intervener, B.B. and file this Response t ndant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it. P mg on the production of the NM agre