Epstein Secrets

ent 245 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2009 Page 10 of 50 Richard H. Willits, Esquire Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 Phone: (561) 582-7600 Fax: (561) 588-8819 Robert Critton, Esquire COUNSEL LIST Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman LLP 515 North Flagl

9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 47 Entered on FLSD Dock'e(03/12/2009 Page 4 of 21 C.M.A. v. Epstein, et al. Page 4 factual allegations"); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote an

following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of March , 2009: Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H Willits P A tom* Lake Worth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 ounse or a

9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2009 Page 4 of 21 C.M.A. v. Epstein, et al. Page 4 factual allegations"). Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote an

owing Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 7th day of January, 2009: Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. th Lake Worth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Search Denney Scarola Shipley, P.A. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. A

.2d 338 (1989) (" Rule 12(b)(6) does not countenance ... dismissals based on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations"); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232. 236. 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote an

r Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL 33414 Phone: Fax: Richard H. Willits, Esquire Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 Phone: Fax: EFTA00175318 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT C

.2d 338 (1989) (" Rule 12(b)(6) does not countenance ... dismissals based on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations"); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236. 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote an