Epstein Secrets

d on these matters on June 25, 2009. The Court notes that Mr. Goldberger, Esq. and Mr. Critton, Esq. were present on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of E.W., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was prese

9 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. Habit:, 622 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this

d on these matters on June 25, 2009. The Court notes that Mr. Goldberger, Esq. and Mr. Critton, Esq. were present on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of M., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was present

9 769 .2d 389d4 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 M.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary arties" to the action. See Shienvold v. liable, 622 e2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this p

d on these matters on June 25, 2009. The Court notes that Mr. Goldberger, Esq. and Mr. Critton, Esq. were present on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of M., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was present

9 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. liable. 622 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this