Epstein Secrets

ithout violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1

Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell cassell

the statutory provision."') ( quoting Harris v. Garner, 216 F.3d 970, 972 (11th Cir. 2000) (en bane)) (f

SQ. Florida Bar No. 224 I 62 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BU

rimination claim because the government may use voluntarily filed tax returns against a defendant without violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1976) (holding that disclosures in tax returns are not compelled incriminations and may be used as e

Isidro Manuel Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefs

ithout violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1

Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell cassell