Epstein Secrets

ounty Courhouse 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: State of Florida 1 Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 2008 CF009381A Dear Judge Colbath, JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY JACK A. GOLDBERGER JASON S.WEISS Board Certified Oiminallrial Attorney Member of New Jersey & Fonda Bars Enclosed please fi

attorney, Jack Goldberger, an op- portunity to argue that the document was properly sealed and asked lawyers to submit briefs to him by Friday. Colbath also set a full hearing for June 25. Attorneys for young women now suing Epstein are asking Colbath to un- seal the deal that Epstein brokered

g Co., 393 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2005) 23 Oregonian Publishing Co. I United States District Court, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990) 9 U.S. I Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651 (E.D. Va. 2007) 23 United States I Kooistra, 796 F.3d 1390 (11th Cir. 1986) 9 State Cases Anderson I E.T„ 862 So. 2d 839

County Courhouse 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: State of Florida Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 2008 CF009381A Dear Judge Colbath, JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY JACK A. GOLDBERGER JASON S.WEISS Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney Member of New Jersey & Florida Bars Enclosed pleas

attorney, Jack Goldberger, an op- portunity to argue that the document was properly sealed and asked lawyers to submit briefs to him by Friday. Colbath also set a full hearing for June 25. Attorneys for young Epstein women now suing Epstein are asking Colbath to un- seal the deal that Epstein b

g Co., 393 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2005) 23 Oregonian Publishing Co.'. United States District Court, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990) 9 U.S. I Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651 (E.D. Va. 2007) 23 United States'. Kooistra, 796 F.3d 1390 (11th Cir. 1986) 9 State Cases Anderson I E.T., 862 So. 2d 83

ion agreement and addendum is confidential and not a public record. It should remain sealed. Principles of supremacy and comity required that Judge Colbath defer to the federal court, which has twice denied disclosure of the confidential non- prosecution between the U.S. government and Mr. Epstein to th

tects "matter[sJ occurring before the grand jury," including "the strategy or direction of the investigation . . . and the like"); United States v. Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651, 655-56 (E.D. Va. 2007) (explaining that the rule protects disclosure of "the strategy or direction of a grand jury investigat

th ordered the agreement to be unsealed in June, but Epstein's attorneys appealed the ruling to the Fourth District Court of Appeals, which affirmed Colbath's ruling. Colbath had ruled that the federal agreement — sealed in state court — was improperly sealed. 'I felt it was my fault' More than a dozen

prosecution' the motion states shed this article. COMMENTS Centime's are closed last's 541007. WeitAllitil AMU ADVCRInt inCIAl. IltrtsSois Rosen avd•I !MOM An. C04,4•• ClaVall Pal, awn Uhl 4tH'.. Isdal Weeds I wit 0 Lomplai 0011118510 SaltHebn Unite Pinfi•P•1040.th Avef,taw• • 'Ow

ether or not I want to have it submitted to me in camera. (E.W.-13, page 42, lines 8-15(emphasis added).) All of petitioner's assertions that Judge Colbath's order under review here "violated" Judge Marra's orders, that the lower court gave only "lip service" to Judge Marra, that the supremacy clause a

pp. 1299, 1302-03 (M.D. Fla. 1977). In other words, Rule 6 is implicated if disclosure would reveal secret inner workings of the grand jury. U.S. . Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651, 654 (E.D. Va. 2007). Disclosure of details of a government investigation that is independent of a parallel grand jury proceed