Epstein Secrets

sition dated March 23, 2010 at page169; line 19-21. A: If you want an exclusive list, I don't know. Id. at page 169; line 22. Q: Did you direct Mr. Fisten to do investigations in California? Id. at page 170; line 8-9. A: I directed Mr. Fisten to interview people and ultimately it was learned that they

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

f illegal activities, wire taps, and methods by the Rothstein firm while Mr. Edwards had basically been bringing these cases. The investigator, Mr. Fisten, who's mentioned in the Complaint, represented himself as an FBI agent, falsely represented himself as an FBI agent. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Do you ha

king of Epstein's affidavit is warranted. Edwards does not contend that Epstein failed to comply with a court order as contemplated by Rule 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; nor does Edwards assert that Epstein's affidavit contains material that should be stricken from a pleading as delineated in Rule 1.140 o

sition dated March 23, 2010 at page169; line 19-21. A: If you want an exclusive list, I don't know. Id. at page 169; line 22. Q: Did you direct Mr. Fisten to do investigations in California? Id. at page 170; line 8-9. A: I directed Mr. Fisten to interview people and ultimately it was learned that they

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of