Epstein Secrets

nterest, and is narrowly tailored to b..) that interest." ' Id., at 1571 (quoting Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 802 (I I th Cir.1983) (quoting Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 606-07. 102 S.Ct. 2613, 2619-20, 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982))) (emphasis added). [2] It is immaterial whether the seal

tates District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, No. 1:87-CV-1165-RHEL Robert H. Hall, J., denied motion as untimely. Plaintiff appealed. The Court of Appeals, Fay, Circuit Judge, held that district court abused its discretion in sealing court record in previous litigation without showing of extraordinar

ve information, it must be shown that the denial is necessitated by a compelling governmental interest, and is narrowly tailored to that interest." Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court. 457 U.S. 596 at 606-607, 102 5.0. 2613 at 2620, 73 L.Ed.2d 248 at 257. 6% F.2d at 802. WestlawNext @ 2015 Thomson Reuters. No

nia action. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Robert H. Hall, J., denied the request, and plaintiff appealed. The Court of Appeals held that: (1) desire of federal court litigants to prevent use of pleadings, docket entries, orders, affidavits, depositions, and transcripts or c

its] claim of functioning as surrogates for the public."J9 48 Westmoreland v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for Norfolk Cly., 457 U.S. 596, 606, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982)). 49 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S.

rt W. Sweet, J., 2017 WL 1787934, 325 F.Supp.3d 428, granted motions to intervene, but denied requests to unseal. Intervenors appealed. Holdings: The Court of Appeals, Jose A. Cabranes, Circuit Judge, held that: ['l district court was required to review documents individually and produce specific, on-the-rec