Epstein Secrets

2 of 29 issue of the CVRA's application to pre-indictment situations, since charges had already been filed in cach of these cases. See, e.g., In re Stewart, 552 F.3d 1285, 1289 (11th Cir. 2008).4 Peterson also argues that the right to confer is limited to post-indictment situations because a victim has

Federal prosecutors have used such group meetings in cases involving far larger numbers of victims, such as the Oklahoma City bombing case and the W.R. Grace case. See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 408 F.Supp.2d 998, 1016 (D. Mont. 2005) (Community Advisory Group set up in the town of Libby, Montan

ntry at all levels of the federal courts, and this approach is the normal one for these courts (including courts of this Circuit). See, e.g., In re Stewart (I Ph Cir. 2008) (CVRA enforcement action commenced by motion); In re Antrobus (10th Circuit 2008) (same); In re Dean (5th Cir. 2008) (same). Indeed

(same); In re Dean (5th Cir. 2008) (same). Indeed, in an important case in the District of Montana involving enforcement of victims' rights in the W.R. Grace case, I proceeded in this fashion at the direction of the Justice Department (i.e., the U.S. Attorney for the District of Montana, with whom we were

12 of 29 issue of the CVRA's application to pm-indictment situations, since charges had already been filed in each of these cases. See, e.g., In re Stewart, 552 F.3d 1285, 1289 (11th Cir. 2008).4 Peterson also argues that the right to confer is limited to post-indictment situations because a victim has

Federal prosecutors have used such group meetings in cases involving far larger numbers of victims, such as the Oklahoma City bombing case and the W.R. Grace case. See, e.g., United States I. W.R. Grace, 408 F.Supp.2d 998, 1016 (D. Mont. 2005) (Community Advisory Group set up in the town of Libby, Montan

ntry at all levels of the federal courts, and this approach is the normal one for these courts (including courts of this Circuit). See, e.g., In re Stewart (I Ph Cir. 2008) (CVRA enforcement action commenced by motion); In re Antrobus (10th Circuit 2008) (same); In re Dean (5th Cir. 2008) (same). Indeed

(same); In re Dean (5th Cir. 2008) (same). Indeed, in an important case in the District of Montana involving enforcement of victims' rights in the W.R. Grace case, I proceeded in this fashion at the direction of the Justice Department (i.e., the U.S. Attorney for the District of Montana, with whom we were