3
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
3 / 4
Mentions
In cases that arouse intense public interest . . . `adverse publicity can endanger the ability of the defendant to receive a fair trial.") (quoting Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 378 (1979)). EFTA00728038 As the Court has previously observed, while "[t]here is at common law 'a general right to
that First Amendment is implicated in blanket restrictions on access to records EFTA00728039 of criminal cases not resulting in a conviction). In McVeigh, 119 F.3d at 811-12, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently surveyed the case law and expressed uncertainty whether it would apply Fir
may be sealed if the right to access is outweighed by the interests favoring nondisclosure." Salemme, 985 F.Supp. at 195, quoting United States v. McVeigh, 119 F.3d 806, 811 (10th Cir.1997). "Among the countervailing factors favoring nondisclosure are: (i) prejudicial pretrial publicity; (ii) the dang
ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
o. 101-647, § 502(b) (1996). 2 Id. § 502(b)(1). 3 Id. § 502(b)(3). 24 Id. § 502(b)(5). 25 Id. § 502(b)(4). 26 Id. § 502(a). 27 United States v. McVeigh, 157 F.3d 809, 814-815 (10th Cir. 1998). See generally Cassell, Barbarians at the Gates, supra note 6, at 515-22 (discussing this case in greater det
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639 →Bishop, 76 F. Supp. 866, 868 (D. Or. 1948). 374 448 U.S. 555, 575-76 (1980). 375 Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501, 509 (1984). 376 Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 428 (1979) (Blackmun, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). 3 x 7 Richmond Newspapers, 448 U.S. at 571. 3
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017682 →ARTICLE: Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act
the Victims' Rights Amendment, 1999 Utah L. Rev. 479, 515-22 (discussing the Oklahoma City bombing case in greater detail). 47 See United States v. McVeigh, No. 96-CR-68, 1996 WL 366268, at 2 (D. Colo. June 26, 1996). 48 Td. at 2-3 (discussing application of Fed. R. Evid. 615). 49 Motion of Marsha and
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017720 →utional Argument, 75 N.Y.U_L. Rev. 1658, 1687 (2000); see also Drew L. Kirshen, Vicinage, 29 Okla. L. Rev. 803 (1976). 204 448 U.S. 555 (1980). 205 Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 380 (1979) (internal citation omitted). 206 Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501, 509 (1984). 207 Gann
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742 →Entities connected to both Gannett Co. and McVeigh

Colorado
LOCATION
United States
LOCATION
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
The New York Times
ORGANIZATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION
Salt Lake City
LOCATION
New York
LOCATIONLouarna Gillis
PERSON
New Jersey
LOCATION
US Government
ORGANIZATION
Oregon
LOCATION
Antonin Scalia
PERSON