with John Madden for 21 years to form one of the most popular broadcasting pairings in television history. Died April 16. Al Neuharth, 89. He built Gannett Co. into the largest U.S. newspaper publisher and created USA Today, which became the country’s biggest-selling daily paper. Died April 19 of HOUSE_OVE

Bishop, 76 F. Supp. 866, 868 (D. Or. 1948). 374 448 U.S. 555, 575-76 (1980). 375 Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501, 509 (1984). 376 Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 428 (1979) (Blackmun, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). 3 x 7 Richmond Newspapers, 448 U.S. at 571. 3

utional Argument, 75 N.Y.U_L. Rev. 1658, 1687 (2000); see also Drew L. Kirshen, Vicinage, 29 Okla. L. Rev. 803 (1976). 204 448 U.S. 555 (1980). 205 Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 380 (1979) (internal citation omitted). 206 Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501, 509 (1984). 207 Gann

ess. See Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. at 32-34, (pretrial interrogatories and depositions "were not open to the public at common law"); Gannett Co. v. DePasguale, 443 U.S. 368, 396, 99 S.Ct. 2898, 2914, 61 L.Ed.2d 608 (1979) (Burger, C.J., concurring) ("[I]t has never occurred to anyone, so far

afeguard the due process rights of the accused, has "an affirmative constitutional duty to minimize the effects of prejudicial pretrial publicity." Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 378 (1979). This District has given effect to this Sixth Amendment right through Local Criminal Rule 23.1. Accordingly,

afeguard the due process rights of the accused, has "an affirmative constitutional duty to minimize the effects of prejudicial pretrial publicity." Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 378 (1979). This District has given effect to this Sixth Amendment right through Local Criminal Rule 23.1. Accordingly,

fied a common law tradition of public access to criminal trials, this never extended to preindictment, pretrial proceedings involving a grand jury. Gannett Co. 443 U.S. 368, 99 S.Ct. 2898, indicates as much. In any event, even if there was once a common law right of access to materials of the sort at issue

In cases that arouse intense public interest . . . `adverse publicity can endanger the ability of the defendant to receive a fair trial.") (quoting Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 378 (1979)). EFTA00728038 As the Court has previously observed, while "[t]here is at common law 'a general right to

ess. See Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. at 32-34, (pretrial interrogatories and depositions "were not open to the public at common law"); Gannett Co. v. DePasquale 443 U.S. 368, 396, 99 S.Ct. 2898, 2914, 61 L.Ed.2d 608 (1979) (Burger, C.J., concurring) ("[I]t has never occurred to anyone, so far

afeguard the due process rights of the accused, has "an affirmative constitutional duty to minimize the effects of prejudicial pretrial publicity." Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 378 (1979). This District has given effect to this Sixth Amendment right through Local Criminal Rule 23.1. Accordingly,