Epstein Secrets

(defining "case" as "a question contested before a court of justice"). This general understanding is equally applicable to criminal proceedings. In Chavez v. Martinez , 538 U.S. 760 (2005), the Supreme Court held that a criminal "case" — as distinct from an investigation — "at the very least requires

A00208518 of a criminal investigation "does not constitute a `case' within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment's Self- Incrimination Clause) (citing Blyew and Black's Law Dictionary). Finally, Congress's use of the definite article "the" in reference to the word "case" supports respondent's view that

r thing, in legal parlance the judicial-case connotation is undoubtedly primary." Maj. Op. at 1207. As to the term "case," even the Majority cites Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760, 766, 123 S. Ct. 1994, 2000-01, 155 L.Ed.2d 984 (2003), which supports my conclusion that the CVRA's conferral right attac

Ct. 1994, 155 L.Ed.2d 984 (2003). Notably, in so holding, the Court drew on longstanding tradition, citing its now nearly 150-year-old decision in Blyew a United States for the proposition that the word "case" is synonymous with the word "cause" and "rnean[s] a proceeding in court, a suit, or action

(defining "case" as "a question contested before a court of justice"). This general understanding is equally applicable to criminal proceedings. In Chavez v. Martine:, 538 U.S. 760 (2005), the Supreme Court held that a criminal "case" — as distinct from an investigation — "at the very least requires th

TA00230075 :••,7"• ,:f.,""•••••• Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 11 of 54 Incrimination Clause) (citing Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 581, 595 (1871), and Black's Law Dictionary). Finally, Congress's use of the definite article "the" in referen