Epstein Secrets

sub nom. Gelestino v. United States, 445 U.S. 967 (1980) 15 United States v. Deloitte LLP, 610 F.3d 129 (D.C.Cir. 2010) 23 United States v. Edelman, 458 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2006) 26 United States v. Gonzalez, 669 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2012) 55 United States v. Hare, 49 F.3d 447 (8th Cir.), c

ver his strenuous objection, to produce documents given to him by the government during the course of his settlement/plea negotiations with it. See Jane Doe #2 v. Epstein, No. 08-80119-MARRA, Doc. 462. In response to that order, settlement negotiation correspondence authored by government prosecutors (

es against defendant when discussions occurred; general discussions of leniency did not transform meeting into plea negotiations); United States v. Edelman, 458 F.3d 791, 804-06 (811' Cir. 2006)(Rule 410 inapplicable to statements made during preindictment meetings by defendant seeking to avoid indictm

ered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO PROFFER GOVERNMENT CORRESPONDENCE IN SUPPORT O

ttan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., and requested copies of the briefs filed by the District Attorney’s office in the above-captioned appeal. Ms. Edelman stated that names of victims could be redacted before the briefs were disclosed. a Mr. Frost responded that he could not provide Ms. Edelman with co

turned sexual. Eventually, the Palm Beach police, and then the FBI, came knocking on Licata’s door. In the police report, Licata was referred to as a Jane Doe in order to protect her identity as a minor. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016431 --- PAGE BREAK --- Palm Beach home of registered sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein