Epstein Secrets

rnhard Canter, Gerd Stumme, and Rudolf Wille. Formal Concept Analysis: Foundations and Applications. Springer-Verlag, 2005. HB06. Jeff Hawkins and Sandra Blakeslee. On Intelligence. Brown Walker, 2006. HDY+12. Geoffrey Hinton, Li Deng, bong Yu, George bald, Abdel rahman Mohamed, Navdeep Jaitly, Andrew Senior,

, ImplicationLink, etc.) or a fuzzy value (as in MemberLink, EvaluationLink). • Strong Self-Modification: This is generally used as synonymous with Self-Modification, in a CogPrime context. • Subsymbolic: Involving processing of data using elements that have no correspondence to natural language terms, nor abst

es. The second naive physics manifesto. In R. Shaw lz J. Branford, editor, Formal Theories of the Commonsense World. 1985. 11206. Jeff Hawkins and Sandra Blakeslee. On Intelligence. Brown Walker, 2006. Heb49. Donald Hebb. The organisation of behavior. Wiley, 1949. Hey07. F. Heylighen. The Global Superorganis

cision graph looks like: Input: List L Output: List If ( P1 (L) ) N1(L) Else If ( P2 (L) ) N2 (L) Else If ( Pk (L) ) Nk(L) EFTA00624098 18.4 Self-Modification via Theorem-Proving 323 where the Pi are predicates, and the Ni are schemata corresponding to other nodes of the decision graph (children of the c

Hayes. The second naive physics manifesto. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford, editor, Formal Theories of the Commonsense World. 1985. HBO6. Jeff Hawkins and Sandra Blakeslee. On Intelligence. Brown Walker, 2006. Heb49. Donald Hebb. The organization of behavior. Wiley, 1949. Hey07. F. Heylighen. The Global Superorganism:

nt decision graphs. The decision graph leading to maximal optimization, may not be the one that leads CogPrime cognition in optimal directions. 18.4 Self-Modification via Theorem-Proving Supercompilation is a potentially very valuable tool for self-modification. If one wants to take an existing schema and graduall