Epstein Secrets

tics. Flmtana/Collins, 1977. Orig. published 1916 as "emirs de linguistique generale". EBJ+97. J. Elman, E. Bates, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi. and K. Plunkett. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. MIT Press, 1997. Ede93. Gerald Edelman. Neural darwinism: Sel

, ImplicationLink, etc.) or a fuzzy value (as in MemberLink, EvaluationLink). • Strong Self-Modification: This is generally used as synonymous with Self-Modification, in a CogPrime context. • Subsymbolic: Involving processing of data using elements that have no correspondence to natural language terms, nor abst

eelenwegens. Eine neuronale Theorie der Handfungsregula- tion. Verlag Hans Huber, 2002. EBJ+97. J. Elman, E. Bates, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi, and K. Plunkett. Rethinking Innateness: A Connection-jai Perspective on Development. MIT Press, 1997. EFTA00624120 References 345 Ede93. Gera

cision graph looks like: Input: List L Output: List If ( P1 (L) ) N1(L) Else If ( P2 (L) ) N2 (L) Else If ( Pk (L) ) Nk(L) EFTA00624098 18.4 Self-Modification via Theorem-Proving 323 where the Pi are predicates, and the Ni are schemata corresponding to other nodes of the decision graph (children of the c

ntk des Seelenwagens. Eine neuronale Theorie der Handlungsregula- tion. Verlag Hans Huber, 2002. J. Elman, E. Bates, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi, and K. Plunkett. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. MIT Press, 1997. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013260 References 345 Ede93.

nt decision graphs. The decision graph leading to maximal optimization, may not be the one that leads CogPrime cognition in optimal directions. 18.4 Self-Modification via Theorem-Proving Supercompilation is a potentially very valuable tool for self-modification. If one wants to take an existing schema and graduall