Epstein Secrets

collect, just from memory. When we're dealing with those kinds of claims it is my opinion and the ruling of the EFTA00776414 50 1 Clearly the Rasmussen case is - the 2 primary distinction that I find there is that in 3 that case, there was no question that the 4 probative value, any probative v

CRITTON: No. 11 THE COURT: Hold on. 12 MR. BERGER: We have three clients. One 13 is in federal court, Jane Doe. Mr. Critton 14 wants to take Jane Doe's deposition in these two 15 cases, and III., so she's in front of you 16 as a nonparty on a motion for protective order. 17 THE COURT: I see, b

atement 2 or in her - she says, "I brought over 50 girls 3 there." brought girls and she was there on 4 multiple, tens upon tens of occasions. Jane Doe 5 was there on multiple occasions. 6 It's important to know these young ladies' 7 prior sexual history, whether it's consensual, 8 whether it's

expectation of pri- vacy. He pointed out, "we have recognized that title potential for invasion of privacy is inherent in the litigation process.' Rasmussen, South Flor- ida Blood Service, 500 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla.1987). While civil litigants may have a legitimate expecta- tion of privacy in pretrial depo

Mr. Josefsberg so that he can begin his representation, and provide me with a copy for my file. I have conferred with the lead AUSA in the case of Jane Doe 1 and 21 United States, EFTA00183579 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. ROY BLACK, ESQ. AUGUST 26, 2008 PAGE 2 OF 2 and he agrees that, based upon the discu

ectation of pri- vacy. He pointed out, "we have ... recognized that It]he potential for invasion of privacy is inherent in the litigation process.' Rasmussen I South Flor- ida Blood Service, 500 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla.1987). While civil litigants may have a legitimate expecta- tion of privacy in pretrial

tered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. FILED by JUL 0 9 2008 STEVEN N. LAMMORE CLERK U.S MST. CS s.o. or nA.-wra. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO VICTIM'S EMERGENCY PETITION F