Epstein Secrets

collect, just from memory. When we're dealing with those kinds of claims it is my opinion and the ruling of the EFTA00776414 50 1 Clearly the Rasmussen case is - the 2 primary distinction that I find there is that in 3 that case, there was no question that the 4 probative value, any probative v

s you get to 9 depose Mr. Epstein one time, all right. Already 10 Mr. Epstein's been deposed by Sid Garcia in the 11 State, he's been set by in B.B., which is one of 12 your cases, by Mr. Kuvin and the State, and Mr. 13 Berger and Mr. Edwards have started his 14 deposition, so this is kind o

expectation of pri- vacy. He pointed out, "we have recognized that title potential for invasion of privacy is inherent in the litigation process.' Rasmussen, South Flor- ida Blood Service, 500 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla.1987). While civil litigants may have a legitimate expecta- tion of privacy in pretrial depo

RT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA1LM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., ., AND B.B., Respondents. SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX TO PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., d/b/a THE PALM BEACH POST'S RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO

ectation of pri- vacy. He pointed out, "we have ... recognized that It]he potential for invasion of privacy is inherent in the litigation process.' Rasmussen I South Flor- ida Blood Service, 500 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla.1987). While civil litigants may have a legitimate expecta- tion of privacy in pretrial

APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., E.W., AND B.B., Respondents. SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX TO PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., d/b/a THE PALM BEACH POST'S RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO